Forefoot Running Prevents Injury By Naturally Increasing Cadence

One of the best changes to your running form is the forefoot strike (see here what a proper forefoot strike looks like) because it actually improves many aspects of your stride in ways that provides more protection against damaging impacts than heel strike running.

One way forefoot running produces its own impact protection is by naturally increasing cadence, or step-rate, which is the number of times your feet contact the ground per/min.

The reason cadence is naturally higher in forefoot running is due to the reductions in stride length which is also naturally engaged when landing forefoot-first.

The farther you land away from your heel, towards the front of your foot, causes the foot to have less time to swing out all the way through and around the stance limb thereby reducing stride length.

Forefoot Running Prevents Injury By Increasing Cadence — When you land with a forefoot strike *(above left)* when you run, cadence naturally increases because stride length is naturally reduced, which altogether, are proven mechanical components for unburdening the leg as compared with heel strike running *(above right)*. Landing heel-first when running alters your mechanics in ways that lead to over-striding and reduced cadence, causing the foot to brake longer with the ground, which is largely to blame for most impact-related injuries.

Because stride length is reduced, which allows cadence to be higher, forefoot running enables a contact with the ground that’s so brief, many injurious impact variables are not fully produced, or are even eliminated.

But why does a higher run cadence work so well in phasing out injurious impacts?

Research supporting the relationship of increased run cadence and reduced impact on the leg comes from a 2011 and a 2016 study in the journal of Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,confirmed that increased cadence and reduced stride length go hand in hand, and this dynamic-duo was most responsible for reducing peak tibial (shin) contact forces.

The studies also found that a shorter stride length automatically helped pull the foot in more to land closer to the center of mass (the upper body) of which this landing arrangement effectively reduced peak ground reaction forces on the lower leg.

This work indicates that foot strike pattern matters in running because how you land on your foot changes the direction of the swing leg in that forefoot running corresponds to reduced stride length and higher cadence which directly facilitates the suppression of harmful impacts on the leg.

Heel strike running (shown below) has the opposite effect in that the farther back you land on your heel, the greater the over-reach of the leg to do so, the greater the stride length, and therefore, the lower the cadence. What makes this so ineffective is that the center of mass ends up farther away from initial foot strike position, causing the mass of the body to abruptly grind to a halt for a prolong period of time, resulting in higher levels of damaging impacts and mechanical loads which are well on record for harming the foot and leg.

With that said, here are more reasons heel strike running causes injury, and here’s why forefoot running does not.

References:

Heiderscheit BC, Chumanov ES, Michalski MP, Wille CM, Ryan MB. Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during
running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):296–302.

Luedke et al. Influence of Step Rate on Shin Injury and Anterior Knee Pain in High School Runners. Med Sci Sports Exer, 2016; DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000890

If you’ve enjoyed my post on heel strike vs forefoot running, you’ll love my YouTube channel here, where I talk at lengths about the evidence-based reasons forefoot running is the best way to run, and how running barefoot can make you run better in shoes!

If you’d like, you can support Run Forefoot and help keep it going by making a donation in any amount of your choosing: