A heel strike landing represents the greatest force in running, according to Dr. Uffe Jorgensen. Heel strike running generates greater body-shock as well as collision, braking, and transient forces compared to forefoot running.
The body-shock of heel strike running exerts damaging pathophysiological effects on the body and is directly related to body loads where as shock increases, active shock absorption in the muscles increases and so does the risk of injury.
At heel strike, the magnitude of the body-shock ramps up active shock absorption in the muscles at the expense of greater oxygen consumption and therefore energy expenditure.
Jorgensens et al., investigated the effects of a heel counter on reducing injury in heel strike runners via reducing muscle loads where muscle load was expressed by oxygen consumption.
Side note: A heel counter is a form of external support in the heel of a non-minimalist running shoe which affects shock absorption and stability at heel strike.
Intriguingly, the researchers found that oxygen cost of running increased when the heel counter was removed, contradicting past work which found that weight reduction of a shoe reduced the oxygen cost of running. That is, the lighter the shoe, the lesser the oxygen consumption, the greater the running efficiency, but not in this study.
Why did removing the heel counters cause the heel strikers to be less economical?
The heel strikers were less efficient without the heel counters because the body was trying to adapt to the increase in body load due to the body- shock at heel strike.
The researchers suggested that the heel strike body-shock increased oxygen consumption due to increased eccentric muscle action and joint flexion (i.e. adaptation) in response to the increase in body loads.
This is how overuse injuries occur: an energy crisis arises resulting in fatigue when the magnitude of the body-shock exceeds the absorptive capacity of the musculature during heel strike running.
More studies are adding to mounting evidence for the effectiveness of forefoot running in injury prevention.
Forefoot running has been found to have a net benefit on the body: less shock, less pain, less muscular work for shock absorption, and therefore less injury.
More From Run Forefoot:
- Forefoot Running: A Potential Strategy to Treat Shin Splints
- Forefoot Runners May Run Safer on Any Surface, Regardless of Surface Hardness
- Heel Strikers Wanting to Switch to Forefoot Running, But Are Afraid of Injury
- Alberto Salazar: Run Like a Sprinter to be a Great Distance Runner
References:Jorgensen, U. (1990). Body load in heel strike running: The effect of a firm heel counter.
BSc Neurobiology; MSc Biomechanics candidate, ultra minimalist runner & founder of RunForefoot. I was a heel striker, always injured. I was inspired by the great Tirunesh Dibaba to try forefoot running. Now, I'm injury free. This is why I launched Run Forefoot, to advocate the health & performance benefits of forefoot running and to raise awareness on the dangers of heel striking, because the world needs to know.
Latest posts by Bretta Riches (see all)
- Is Heel Strike Running Bad for Performance? - 19/03/2020
- Heel Strike Running May Cause Achilles Heel Tendonitis - 04/03/2020
- Best Barefoot Trail Running Shoes - 03/02/2020